In a decisive move, legislators in the Democratic Republic of the Congo have greenlit a landmark referendum law, drawing both applause and sharp criticism. The bill, passed by an overwhelming majority in the National Assembly, sets the stage for potential constitutional changes that could pave the way for President Félix Tshisekedi to seek a third term. But what exactly does this new legislation entail, and how might it reshape the nation’s foundational charter? More importantly, what lies ahead in the process that could lead to a constitutional overhaul?
Inside the new referendum law: what changes are on the table?
The adopted proposal outlines the procedural framework for organizing a national referendum, a mechanism that could be used to alter the Constitution. According to legal experts, the law introduces specific conditions under which a referendum can be initiated, including thresholds for citizen petitions and parliamentary approvals. Critics argue that the text, while framed as a democratic tool, could be weaponized to legitimize constitutional amendments that extend presidential mandates beyond current limits.
The law also defines the role of the electoral commission in overseeing the referendum process, ensuring transparency and fairness. However, opposition figures contend that the legislation lacks robust safeguards against political manipulation, raising concerns about its potential misuse in consolidating power.
Could this lead to a constitutional revision?
If the referendum law is implemented as intended, the next logical step would be a constitutional revision. The Constitution currently restricts presidents to two consecutive terms. A successful referendum could amend this provision, allowing Tshisekedi—whose second term ends in 2028—to run again in 2029. Political analysts suggest that the timing of this legislative push aligns with broader regional trends, where term-limit debates have sparked both protests and legal battles.
Proponents of the referendum argue that it reflects the will of the people, emphasizing the importance of public consultation in governance. Yet, detractors warn that such changes could erode democratic norms and trigger instability, particularly in a region already grappling with political volatility.
What happens next?
The journey from a passed law to a constitutional revision is fraught with procedural and political hurdles. The referendum law must first be approved by the Senate before it can proceed to public consultation. If the Senate endorses the bill, a national referendum could be organized within months, depending on logistical preparations and public mobilization.
For now, the debate rages on. Will this referendum law strengthen democratic participation or serve as a tool for executive overreach? The answer may soon be put to the test at the ballot box.
