Gabon’s government has taken a decisive step by initiating the unilateral termination of its long-standing fishing partnership with the European Union, citing deep-seated imbalances in the agreement. This move follows President Brice Oligui Nguema’s announcement in June 2025, which highlighted the need to renegotiate terms perceived as unfair to the Central African nation.
EU signals willingness to negotiate revised terms
The European Union’s delegation in Gabon has responded with assurances of a constructive and transparent dialogue. In an official statement, the delegation expressed readiness to explore a new Sustainable Fishing Partnership Agreement alongside a mutually beneficial protocol. The goal, they emphasized, is to establish a modernized, balanced, and effective framework that aligns with evolving priorities.
key criticisms of the existing deal
The Gabonese administration has long pointed to structural flaws in the original agreement, first signed in 2007. Among the primary grievances:
- Economic disparity: Revenues generated from EU fishing rights in Gabonese waters fail to cover the true value of catches, let alone the state’s expenses for monitoring, control, and lost local processing opportunities.
- Limited local benefits: Investments in job creation, skills development, and community growth remain insufficient, undermining long-term economic gains.
- Resource risks: Without shared transparency and scientific oversight, overexploitation of marine resources poses a growing threat to Gabon’s delicate ecosystems.
a decade-long agreement under scrutiny
The partnership, valued at approximately 17 billion Central African CFA francs (around €26 million) over five-year cycles, has undergone multiple renewals—most recently in 2021. Yet, its sustainability has been repeatedly questioned, culminating in the current push for reform.
what’s next for Gabon’s fishing industry?
While the EU voices optimism about crafting a fresh accord, Gabon appears determined to secure terms that prioritize national interests. The outcome hinges on whether both sides can bridge their differences in upcoming negotiations, ensuring a deal that balances ecological stewardship with economic fairness.
